Accountants often see the impact that excess stock has on a business long before the business owner realises what is happening. Over-stocking drains cash, fills storage space, increases waste, and restricts flexibility at key moments. Many business owners still treat high stock levels as a sign of strength, yet in practice it is one of the most common and avoidable pressures on working capital. By helping clients understand how to optimise their stock, accountants can add real value and improve day-to-day decision making.

A good starting point is a closer look at demand patterns. Businesses often order based on habit rather than evidence, and assumptions can easily take on a life of their own. When accountants analyse twelve to twenty-four months of sales data, they usually uncover clear patterns that are not reflected in current ordering behaviour. Seasonal products, slow movers, and steady sellers all behave differently, and understanding these rhythms allows stock levels to align more closely with what customers actually buy.

Accountants also encourage clients to question their reliance on supplier discounts. Bulk deals appear attractive but often hide significant costs. Extra stock ties up cash that could be better used elsewhere and increases storage and handling expenses. A simple comparison between the real carrying cost of excess stock and the financial benefit of a discount often shows that smaller, more regular orders provide better value in the long run. Price per unit is only one part of the equation.

Introducing minimum and maximum stock levels is another practical step. Minimum levels act as early warning points for reordering, and maximum levels help prevent shelves from filling with more than the business can sensibly sell. These controls do not need to be complicated. A straightforward spreadsheet or low-cost stock system can support regular monthly reviews. As conditions change, these levels can be adjusted so the business remains agile and avoids relying on outdated assumptions.

Lead times are another area where accountants frequently help clients identify unnecessary buffers. Many businesses carry more stock than they need because they believe suppliers will take longer to deliver than they actually do. Reviewing real lead times against assumed ones often reveals opportunities to reduce stock safely. When decisions are based on accurate data rather than instinct, clients gain confidence to hold less stock without risking service levels.

Stock ageing reports are equally valuable. They show which items have been sitting unsold for too long. Once slow movers are identified, clients can take action through promotions or clearance activity to release cash and create space for faster-moving lines. Even modest reductions can make a meaningful difference to cash flow.

Finally, accountants highlight the benefits of simple cloud-based stock tools. Even the most basic systems offer alerts, clearer visibility, and easier tracking, which supports more precise ordering without adding unnecessary complexity.

By providing this guidance, accountants help clients reduce waste, free up working capital, and run more responsive operations. Optimised stock levels lead to better decisions, improved resilience, and a healthier overall business.

The rules that govern who pays Income Tax in Scotland is determined by whether an individual is considered a Scottish taxpayer. For most people, determining Scottish taxpayer status is straightforward. Individuals who live in Scotland are considered Scottish taxpayers, while those who live elsewhere in the UK are not.

If a taxpayer has homes in both Scotland and elsewhere in the UK, HMRC guidance is used to determine their main home for Scottish Income Tax purposes. Those without a permanent home who regularly stay in Scotland, such as offshore workers or hotel residents, may also be liable for SRIT.

If a person moves to or from Scotland during a tax year, their tax liability is determined by where they spent the majority of that year. Scottish taxpayer status applies to the entire tax year and cannot be split.

Those defined as Scottish taxpayers are liable to pay the Scottish Rate of Income Tax (SRIT) on their non-savings and non-dividend income.

Employees with a second job, third job or more may be able to defer or delay paying Class 1 National Insurance on their additional employment. This deferment can be requested when Class 1 National Insurance contributions are being paid to more than one employer.

If you have 2 jobs, over the tax year you’ll need to earn:

• £967 or more per week from one job over the tax year.
• £242 or more per week in your second job

If you have more than 2 jobs, over the tax year you’ll need to earn:

• £1,209 or more per week from 2 of those jobs
• £242 or more per week in your other jobs

This deferral could result in NIC deductions at a reduced rate of 2% on your weekly earnings between £242 and £967 in one of your jobs, instead of the standard rate of 8%.

If you are allowed to defer, HMRC will inform you which employer is your main one for full Class 1 National Insurance contributions and which employers you can pay at the reduced 2% rate, sending those employers a certificate of deferment. HMRC does not share information about your other jobs with your employers.

HMRC will check if you have paid enough National Insurance at the end of the tax year and will write to you if you owe anything.

VAT road fuel scale charges are fixed, standardised amounts that businesses must use to account for output VAT when they provide fuel for private use in a vehicle that is also used for business purposes.

The VAT road fuel scale charges are published annually with the current figures applying from 1 May 2025 to 30 April 2026. The fuel scale rates are designed to encourage the use of cars with low CO2 emissions.

A business can use the VAT fuel scale charges to work how much VAT they need to pay back when a business car is used for private journeys. This approach removes the need to keep detailed mileage records. In practice, businesses should reclaim all the VAT on the fuel for the car, then use the fuel scale charge tool to work out the correct charge for the period. Once calculated, this amount needs to be included in the VAT owed on the VAT Return.

Where the CO2 emission figure is not a multiple of five, the figure is rounded down to the next multiple of five to determine the level of the charge. For a bi-fuel vehicle which has two CO2 emissions figures, the lower of the two figures should be used. There are special rules for cars which are too old to have a CO2 emissions figure.

There is now less than 1 months to the self-assessment filing deadline for submissions of the 2024-25 tax returns. We urge our readers who have not yet completed and filed their 2024-25 tax return to file as soon as possible to avoid the stress of last-minute preparations as the 31 January 2026 deadline fast approaches.

You should also be aware that payment of any tax due should also be made by this date. This includes the remaining self-assessment balance for the 2024-25 tax year, and the first payment on account for the 2025-26 tax year.

Earlier this year, more than 11.5 million people submitted their 2023-24 self-assessment tax returns by the 31 January deadline. This included 732,498 taxpayers who left their filing until the final day and almost 31,442 that filed in the last hour (between 23:00 and 23:59) before the deadline!

There is a new digital PAYE service for the High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC). This allows Child Benefit claimants who previously used self-assessment solely to pay the charge to opt out and instead pay it through their tax code.

If you are filing online for the first time you should ensure that you register to use HMRC’s self-assessment online service as soon as possible. Once registered an activation code will be sent by mail. This process can take up to 10 working days. 

If you miss the filing deadline you will be charged a £100 fixed penalty (unless you have a reasonable excuse) which applies even if there is no tax to pay, or if the tax due is paid on time. There are further penalties for late tax returns still outstanding 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the deadline. There are additional penalties for late payment of tax amounting to 5% of the tax unpaid at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months.

HMRC has published a new Making Tax Digital newsletter. This newsletter is mainly intended for taxpayers and agents who are currently testing the Making Tax Digital for Income Tax (MTD for IT) system. MTD for IT will become mandatory in phases from April 2026.

For nearly two years, HMRC has been stress-testing its MTD for IT systems to ensure they can support increasing numbers of volunteer taxpayers. So far, HMRC has confirmed that testing has successfully deal with:

• The sign-up process works for individuals and agents, including those with non-standard accounting periods.
• Volunteers can make and edit quarterly submissions and add income sources.
• Volunteers can opt out of quarterly obligations.
• PAYE income pre-populates into estimated payments on account.
• Payments are correctly allocated within MTD for IT.

More recent testing in 2025 as HMRC scales up the rollout include:

April–June 2025

• Re-testing sign-up to confirm it can cope with larger volumes.
• Testing the ability for volunteers to appoint multiple agents (one for quarterly returns and one for end-of-year submissions).

July–September 2025

• Ensuring taxpayers and agents can make their first quarterly update via software completing the quarterly requirement.
• Checking the accuracy of estimated payments on account based on income to date.
• Testing key functions in the digital tax account, such as adding or stopping income sources and opting in or out of the service.

During the testing phase, there are no penalties for late submissions, but submitting on time is encouraged by HMRC as it helps those testing the system understand the requirements and allows for the service to be properly stress tested.

If your qualifying income is over £50,000 in the 2024–2025 tax year, you will be required to start using MTD for IT from 6 April 2026. There are some minimal exemptions in place.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has raised its savings guarantee for bank deposits, increasing the deposit protection limit from £85,000 to £120,000 per person. This change came into effect on 1 December 2025 and marks a significant increase in how your bank deposits are protected in the UK.

This new deposit protection limit ensures that qualifying UK bank and building society depositors are covered if their bank fails. The FSCS compensation limit is reviewed periodically by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). Following a consultation in March 2025, the PRA confirmed the increase in November 2025. Prior to this, the £85,000 limit had been in place since January 2017.

The FSCS protection applies per person, per bank or building society, which means joint account holders are eligible for double the protection, or up to £240,000 in total. In addition, savers with certain types of temporary high balances such as proceeds from a house sale, insurance payouts or inheritances can also benefit from increased protection. This limit has increased from £1 million to £1.4 million per depositor per life event. This additional coverage is available for up to six months.

For most savers, the new £120,000 limit will provide adequate protection. However, those with deposits exceeding this amount should consider spreading their savings across multiple banks or building societies to ensure all their funds are covered. It is important to note that if you hold multiple accounts within a single banking group (i.e., banks that share the same banking licence), the £120,000 limit applies to the total amount across all accounts within that banking group, not to each individual account.

You do not need to take any action to benefit from the increased protection. If your bank or building society were to fail, the FSCS would automatically compensate you up to the new limits.

Many modern companies insist on the inclusion of restrictive covenants to limit the freedoms of employees upon the termination of their contracts. However, the High Court recently reinforced the stringent legal principles governing the enforceability of such restrictive covenants, suggesting that they often overstep.

A young man had been working as a salesperson for a UK subsidiary of an American company that sells made-to-measure suits and shirts manufactured in the USA. His original contract included restrictive covenants limited to 6 months. However, the contract was changed in 2022 to double the duration of the non-compete covenant to 12 months and remove the previous reliefs, significantly widening their scope. The employee asserted that he was not informed of these changes, and the claimant failed to produce any evidence to justify the widening of the scope of the limitations or the doubling of their duration.

The employee’s initial performance was strong, although following a conduct issue in January 2025, he was subjected to an addendum requiring humiliating and intrusive conditions, including weekly “counselling”, a ban from earned trips, and exclusion from leadership roles. The ex-employee had also raised product quality concerns, which he felt were ignored, and found the work culture ‘toxic’ and the disciplinary action both unfair and intrusive. As a consequence, he resigned in frustration in 2025, only to be subjected to an “insensitive, verging on brutal” retaliation. Within two days, the HR manager had cut off all IT access, threatened an investigation, and banned the defendant from the office. A day later, on Sunday, the claimant’s lawyers hand-delivered a threatening letter to the defendant’s home seeking to enforce a 12-month restrictive covenant. Moreover, there were claims that the defendant had breached his contractual duties, including running down his sales in the months prior to his resignation, and soliciting staff.

The High Court dismissed the claim for breach of contract and ruled that the 12-month restrictive covenant was unenforceable, as it far exceeded what was reasonably necessary to protect the claimant’s business. Moreover, the Court found the decline in performance to be stress-related and due to his inevitable demotivation.

This case reinforces the longstanding principle that courts will not uphold a covenant if it extends beyond what is strictly necessary to protect an employer’s legitimate business interests, which are typically delimited to confidential information and customer goodwill. The case serves as a warning in relation to the risks employers run when their conduct is perceived to be heavy-handed, humiliating, or toxic, particularly during disciplinary or exit procedures. HR departments should be wary of engaging in overtly humiliating or heavy-handed disciplinary rituals, as these may be viewed as a form of brutality.

As we look ahead to 2026, there is growing speculation about how the Bank of England will manage interest rates during what many economists believe will be a period of calmer inflation, steadier wage growth and a more predictable economic backdrop. After several years shaped by sharp price rises, supply chain shocks and policy responses that required rapid increases to the Bank Rate, the outlook for the coming year appears more settled and this is creating a sense that borrowing costs may edge downwards rather than upwards.

The current Bank Rate stands at around four per cent following a series of cuts through 2024 and 2025 as inflation eased gradually. Policymakers have indicated that they remain alert to any resurgence in inflationary pressure, yet they also recognise that the period of high inflation is now behind us. If this trend continues and inflation drifts closer to the Bank’s long term target, it will give the Monetary Policy Committee more room to make modest reductions during 2026. Many forecasters expect something in the region of a quarter to half a percentage point of cuts during the year, although the timing will depend heavily on the data released each quarter.

For households and businesses, this would create a slightly more comfortable lending environment. Mortgage borrowers on variable deals may feel some relief as repayments fall a little and businesses that rely on flexible credit facilities could find that their financing costs ease. Fixed mortgage rates may also become more attractive if lenders anticipate further gradual reductions. However, the broader economic impact is unlikely to be dramatic, since the Bank is not expected to deliver large or rapid cuts. The emphasis is more likely to remain on steady adjustments that avoid disrupting confidence or encouraging excessive borrowing.

It is worth noting that a full return to the ultra-low interest rate environment seen before the pandemic is not expected. Structural changes in the UK economy, global supply conditions and the government’s fiscal position all point towards a future in which interest rates remain higher than the levels seen in the decade prior to 2020. Even so, a move towards slightly lower borrowing costs in 2026 would be consistent with a maturing recovery and a gradual balancing of supply and demand across the economy.

Overall, the most probable outcome for 2026 is a measured reduction in interest rates that supports economic stability without risking a renewed surge in inflation.

Food and energy costs remain central concerns for households and businesses because they influence everything from wages to margins to day to day operating decisions. Inflation is easing compared to the volatility of the last few years, but the picture for the next twelve months is still mixed. Prices appear set to rise more slowly, yet neither category is likely to fall in any meaningful way.

Food price outlook

Food prices surged during the supply chain disruptions of 2021 to 2023 and were pushed higher again by wage pressures, transport costs and global shipping instability. Although the pace of increase has slowed during the past year, prices remain high. Many clients still question why food costs have not dropped as headline inflation falls. The reason is that the underlying conditions that drove those increases have not disappeared. Agriculture, food production, and distribution still face labour shortages, higher input costs, and ongoing uncertainty in global trade routes.

The most likely outcome for the coming year is a gradual easing in the rate of food inflation rather than a reduction in prices. Supermarkets report calmer supply chains and producers appear more willing to absorb cost pressures in order to protect sales volumes. Better harvests in some regions and lower freight costs should also help. These factors together should keep the next year more stable than the recent past.

Energy price outlook

Energy prices have been among the most unpredictable elements of the recent inflation cycle. While the extreme spikes have eased, the underlying global influences remain. The UK is particularly exposed because it relies heavily on imported gas and is tied to international pricing. Global gas markets continue to react to geopolitical tensions, shipping disruptions and variations in European storage levels. These variables explain why energy pricing still carries a degree of uncertainty.

However, the direction for next year looks a little steadier.

What this means for business planning

The next year is unlikely to bring substantial falls in food or energy prices, but the environment should feel less pressured. This increased stability provides an opportunity for better budgeting and more confident forecasting. Hospitality businesses and manufacturers may find it easier to plan pricing strategies, menus and supply arrangements. Broader stability also supports decisions on energy efficiency projects since assumptions about future savings appear more reliable.

Starting in 2028-29, the government will introduce a High Value Council Tax Surcharge (HVCTS) for residential properties in England valued at £2 million or more. This surcharge will be collected by local authorities, but the revenue will go to central government.

High Value Council Tax Surcharge Charging Structure

The surcharge amounts will be based on the value of the residential property in 2026. The surcharge will increase as the property value rises, up to a maximum charge of £7,500 for properties valued over £5 million.

According to HM Treasury figures, the surcharge will apply to fewer than 1% of properties in England. Homeowners, not tenants, will be liable for the surcharge, which will be in addition to their existing Council Tax. Social housing will be excluded.

Properties above the £2 million threshold will be reassessed every five years by the Valuation Office. The surcharge rates will increase annually in line with CPI inflation starting in 2029-30.

This new charge is expected to raise around £430 million annually for local government services. Local authorities will be compensated for the additional costs of administering the surcharge. A public consultation on further details, including reliefs and exemptions, will take place next year.

In the Autumn Budget, the Chancellor had been expected to increase fuel duty rates. However, she has extended the fuel duty cut for a further 6 months to help support households and businesses. 

The Chancellor said ‘I know that the cost of travelling to and from work is still too expensive, so I am extending the 5p cut until September 2026. And because I know that changes in wholesale prices are not always passed onto motorists, I am bringing in new rules to mandate petrol forecourts to share real-time prices through a new Fuel Finder.’ 

This means that the temporary cut in the rates of fuel duty introduced at Spring Statement in March 2022, and extended multiple times is to be extended for a further 6 months until 31 August 2026.

The planned inflation-based increase for 2026-27 will be cancelled. Together with the launch of Fuel Finder, these measures are expected to save families £89 next year compared to previous plans.