The Court of Appeal addressed the complexities of benefit scheme amendments and the lines of responsibility within corporate structures in a complex case surrounding post-employment entitlements. A Mr. Fasano had been an employee of RB Health Ltd., a member of the Reckitt Benckiser (RB) Group of companies, until the 13th of June 2019. The RB Group operates a long-term incentive plan, or LTIP, which makes provision of shares or share options for senior personnel employed by its various companies. 

On the 18th of September 2019, RB Group amended the terms of the 2015 LTIP, requiring those participating in the 2015 LTIP to be employed as of 18 September 2019 to benefit from amended performance conditions in May 2020. Thus, Mr. Fasano was not eligible for an award under the amended LTIP rules. Mr. Fasano brought his case against RB Health and the RB Group to a tribunal, alleging that he had been subjected to indirect discrimination on the grounds of age, contrary to Sections 19 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010. 

However, the tribunal held that RB Group was acting as the agent of RB Health when it amended the terms of the rules of the 2015 LTIP and that the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) thus pursued a legitimate aim. On appeal, it was found that the PCP applied by RB Group was incapable of achieving any legitimate aim of retaining staff and thus was not justified. However, the appeal was ultimately dismissed as the RB Group was not acting as the agent of RB Health, and neither RB Health nor RB Group was liable by reason of Sections 109 and 110 of the Act. 

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and agreed with the appeals tribunal that RB Group was not acting as an agent for RB Health when it amended the performance conditions of the LTIP. Therefore, RB Health is not, therefore, liable for any change made by RB Group to the LTIP pursuant to Section 109 of the Act. The Judge emphasised that, for agency to exist under common law and therefore within the scope of the Act, there needs to be clear authorisation from the principal (RB Health) for the agent (RB Group) to act on its behalf as regards a third party, such as Mr. Fasano. The fact that RB Health's employees benefited from the LTIP didn't automatically make RB Group its agent, although there might have been a different outcome if the rules had been applied by an employer to current employees.  

This case demonstrates that, if a parent company, rather than the direct employer, makes a discriminatory decision regarding benefits, it might be harder to hold the direct employer liable under agency principles. Nonetheless, employers need to ensure that any performance-related policies are justifiable in their aim and implementation and non-discriminatory. 

Gross profit margin
This measures the profitability of your core operations by comparing gross profit (sales minus cost of goods sold) to total revenue. A stable or improving gross margin indicates pricing, production, or service delivery is efficient. A declining margin may signal rising costs or pricing issues.

Formula: (Gross Profit ÷ Revenue) × 100

Cash flow
Positive cash flow ensures a business can meet its obligations, pay suppliers and staff, and invest in growth. Even profitable businesses fail without adequate cash. Tracking cash flow (operating, investing, and financing activities) helps prevent liquidity crises.

Monitor: Monthly net cash inflow/outflow and rolling 3-month cash forecast

Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
This shows how much it costs to acquire a new customer. If CAC is rising without a corresponding increase in customer value or retention, it can drain profitability. Ideally, CAC should be lower than the revenue generated by each customer over their lifetime.

Formula: Total Sales and Marketing Costs ÷ Number of New Customers

Net profit margin
This is the bottom line—what remains after all costs, taxes, and interest. It reflects overall efficiency and financial viability. A strong net margin gives room for reinvestment and debt servicing, and signals long-term sustainability.

Formula: (Net Profit ÷ Revenue) × 100

For high net worth individuals (HNWIs), tax planning is not simply a compliance activity, it is a strategic tool to preserve and grow wealth. With rising scrutiny from HMRC, frozen allowances, and increasingly complex legislation, the value of well-structured planning has never been higher.

HNWIs typically have multiple sources of income: from employment, dividends, property, pensions, or overseas investments. This complexity brings opportunities, but also risk. Without active tax planning, much of that income can be lost to inefficient structuring or missed reliefs.

Using allowances such as the personal allowance, dividend allowance, and savings allowance is key. Where income exceeds £100,000, tapering of allowances becomes relevant. Income splitting between spouses and the use of family investment companies or trusts can help manage liabilities.

The capital gains tax (CGT) annual exemption is now only £3,000 (2025–26). Disposals must be timed carefully, with use of spousal exemptions or crystallising gains across tax years considered.

HNWIs are most exposed to inheritance tax (IHT), which charges 40% on estates above £325,000 (plus any residence nil-rate band). Making lifetime gifts, using trusts, and taking advantage of the exemption for gifts from surplus income can significantly reduce exposure.

Global families must manage UK tax residency and domicile status carefully. The remittance basis may apply to foreign income, but this often requires payment of the remittance basis charge. Changes to domicile treatment post-April 2025 make planning in this area even more important.

Pensions, ISAs, and offshore bonds can provide valuable tax sheltering. For HNWIs, using the annual and lifetime pension allowances efficiently, especially while they remain available, is a core planning task.

In summary, proactive tax planning is about more than saving money. It gives HNWIs confidence, control, and the ability to plan for the future. With HMRC increasing its focus on high earners, reviewing tax affairs annually is no longer optional, it makes good financial sense.

1 July 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 30 September 2024.

6 July 2025 – Complete and submit forms P11D return of benefits and expenses and P11D(b) return of Class 1A NICs.

19 July 2025 – Pay Class 1A NICs (by the 22 July 2025 if paid electronically).

19 July 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 July 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 July 2025).

19 July 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 July 2025. 

19 July 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 July 2025 is payable by today.

1 August 2025 – Due date for corporation tax due for the year ended 31 October 2024.

19 August 2025 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 August 2025. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 August 2025)

19 August 2025 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 August 2025. 

19 August 2025 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 August 2025 is payable by today.

Not all VAT-free sales are the same. Understanding the key difference between zero-rated and VAT-exempt supplies could save your business money and prevent costly VAT mistakes.

It's important to understand the distinction between zero-rated and VAT-exempt supplies. While both may appear similar, because no VAT is charged on the sale, the implications for businesses are very different.

If a supply is exempt from VAT, it means no VAT is charged to the customer, and no output VAT is due. However, the downside for businesses is that they cannot reclaim any input VAT (i.e., VAT paid on purchases or expenses related to the exempt activity). This can make exempt activities more expensive to provide, particularly for businesses that incur significant VAT on costs.

Common examples of VAT-exempt supplies include:

• Insurance
• Finance and credit
• Education and training
• Fundraising events run by charities
• Health and welfare services
• Postal services
• Betting and gaming
• Subscriptions to membership organisations
• Selling, leasing, and letting of commercial land and buildings (though this exemption can be waived under certain conditions)

There are exceptions and detailed rules in most of these examples cited above. Whether a supply qualifies as being VAT exempt may depend on how it's structured and who is receiving the service.

Private pension contributions can attract up to 45% tax relief, if you know how to claim it. Use your £60,000 annual allowance wisely and carry forward unused relief from past years to boost your retirement savings.

You can usually claim tax relief on private pension contributions worth up to 100% of your annual earnings, subject to the overall £60,000 annual allowance. Tax relief is granted at your highest rate of income tax.

This means that if you are:

• A basic rate taxpayer, you receive 20% tax relief
• A higher rate taxpayer, you can claim 40% tax relief
• An additional rate taxpayer, you can claim 45% tax relief

For basic rate taxpayers, the 20% tax relief is typically applied automatically through your pension provider—no further action is needed.

If you pay higher or additional rate tax, you can usually claim the extra tax relief.

• An additional 20% on contributions corresponding to income taxed at 40%
• An additional 25% on contributions corresponding to income taxed at 45%

The tax rates and reliefs outlined above apply to taxpayers in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. If you're based in Scotland, different income tax bands apply, which can affect the amount of tax relief available.

The annual allowance for tax-relievable pension contributions is currently set at £60,000. If you haven’t used your full allowance in the previous three tax years, you may be able to carry forward unused amounts, provided you were a member of a registered pension scheme during those years.

Buying a zero-emission electric car through your limited company could mean 100% tax relief in year one. Understand the capital allowances and boost your business’s tax efficiency with smart vehicle choices.

If you are considering purchasing a company car through a limited company, it’s important to understand the tax implications, especially the significant tax write-offs available for electric vehicles with zero emissions.

The tax treatment will depend on how the car is financed, but in most cases, the vehicle will be classified as a fixed asset, with tax relief available through capital allowances. Unlike other business assets, company cars do not qualify for the Annual Investment Allowance (AIA). Instead, they fall into specific capital allowance categories based on their CO₂ emissions and when they were purchased.

If you purchase a new and unused fully electric or zero-emission car, it qualifies for a 100% First Year Allowance (FYA). This means:

• You can deduct the full cost of the car from your company’s taxable profits in the year of purchase.
• The car must be brand new and registered as zero-emission to qualify.

If the car does not meet the criteria for 100% FYA, it will fall into one of the following categories:

• 18% Main Rate Allowance: Applies to cars with lower CO₂ emissions (but not zero). 18% of the car’s cost can be written off each year on a reducing balance basis.
• 6% Special Rate Allowance: Applies to cars with higher CO₂ emissions or certain second-hand vehicles. Only 6% of the cost is deductible each year.

Expecting lower profits 2024-25 compared to 2023-24? You can ask HMRC to reduce your 31 July 25 tax payment on account. Act early to manage cash flow. Use your online account or we can handle it for you.

Self-assessment taxpayers normally pay their income tax in three instalments each year. The first two payments on account are due on 31 January during the tax year and 31 July after the tax year ends. These are each based on 50% of the previous year’s net income tax liability.

This means that the 31 January 2025 (now passed) and upcoming 31 July 2025 payments are both based on your 2023–24 tax liability.

A final balancing payment is due on 31 January 2026, once your actual tax bill for 2024–25 has been confirmed through your submitted tax return.

If you expect your income or profits for 2024–25 to be lower than for 2023–24, you can ask HMRC to reduce your 31 July 2025 payment on account. This can be done through your HMRC online account or by submitting form SA303 by post. You must provide a reasonable estimate of your expected tax liability.

If we are your registered tax agent we can undertake this election for you.

There is no limit to how many times you can apply to adjust your payments. However, if you reduce your payments too far and underpay, HMRC may charge interest or penalties on the shortfall.

You are not required to make payments on account if:

• Your net Income Tax liability for 2023–24 was less than £1,000, or
• At least 80% of your 2023–24 tax liability was collected at source (e.g. through PAYE).

If your taxable profits are likely to increase in 2024–25, there’s no need to notify HMRC in advance, but you should be prepared for a higher balancing payment in January 2026.

Small business? The VAT Flat Rate Scheme could cut paperwork and improve cash flow. Pay VAT as a set percentage of turnover and enjoy simpler admin, budgeting ease, and even a 1% discount in year one of your registration for VAT.

The VAT Flat Rate Scheme is designed to simplify the process of VAT accounting for small businesses. Rather than calculating VAT on every sale and purchase, eligible businesses pay VAT as a fixed percentage of their turnover including VAT. The percentage applied depends on the type of business activity and is set by HMRC.

This scheme helps reduce the complexity of VAT compliance by minimising the need for detailed calculations and record-keeping of input VAT on purchases.

To join the scheme, a business must expect its annual taxable turnover (excluding VAT) to be no more than £150,000 in the next 12 months.

The advantages of the VAT Flat Rate Scheme include the following:

1. Simplified VAT Administration
   You don’t need to calculate VAT on every sale or claim back VAT on most purchases, which greatly reduces the time and effort involved in VAT reporting.
2. Predictability of VAT Payments
   Knowing your flat rate percentage makes it easier to predict and budget for VAT payments, enhancing cash flow management.
3. Potential Financial Savings
   If your business has relatively low VATable expenses, you may pay less VAT overall under the scheme compared to the standard VAT accounting method.
4. Ideal for Service-Based Businesses
   Businesses with few goods purchases—such as consultants, IT professionals, and freelancers often benefit especially if they don't fall into the limited cost trader category.
5. 1% First-Year Discount
   The introductory discount provides a temporary boost to cash flow, particularly useful for new or growing businesses.

The scheme can be a valuable option for small businesses looking to simplify VAT reporting and reduce administrative workload. However, its suitability should be carefully assessed and regularly reviewed to ensure it remains beneficial as a business grows or its circumstances change.

Make regular gifts from your income and avoid inheritance tax. If structured properly, surplus income gifts can support loved ones and stay outside your estate without the seven-year survival rule.

Wealthier individuals can benefit from a lesser-known but highly effective IHT exemption for gifts made out of surplus income. This is particularly useful for structured, recurring gifts such as grandparents helping with school fees or contributing to a child's living expenses.

These gifts may be fully exempt from inheritance tax if they meet three key conditions:

1. They form part of the transferor’s normal expenditure,
2. They are made out of the transferor’s income, and
3. The transferor retains enough income to maintain their usual standard of living.

If these criteria are met, the gifts are immediately exempt, they do not require the donor to survive seven years, as is the case with potentially exempt transfers (PETs).

It’s important to note that part of a gift may qualify under this exemption, while the remaining portion may be chargeable or exempt under another rule. However, these rules do not apply to certain types of transfers, including:

• Transfers on death or on the ending of a qualifying interest in possession in a trust,
• Certain deemed PETs under Finance Act 1986,
• Transfers made by close companies,
• Premiums on life insurance policies linked to annuities,
• Transfers of capital assets unless those assets were bought with income specifically for gifting.

The exemption does not override the gift with reservation rules, meaning if the donor retains a benefit from the gifted asset (e.g., continues to live in a gifted property rent-free), the gift may still be treated as part of their estate for IHT purposes.

To take advantage of the income-based exemption, careful consideration has to be given to ensure that these payments form part of the transferor’s normal expenditure and is made out of income and not out of capital. The transferor must also ensure that they are left with enough income for them to maintain their normal standard of living after giving any gifts. HMRC may request evidence such as bank statements, income records, and written intentions to support a claim for this exemption. 

Working capital refers to the day-to-day funds a business uses to manage its operations. It is the difference between current assets (such as cash, stock, and trade debtors) and current liabilities (such as trade creditors and short-term loans). Efficient working capital management is crucial for the smooth running of any business. But where does this money actually come from?

There are two main types of funding for working capital: internal and external.

Internal sources come from within the business. Profits retained after tax can be reinvested to support stock purchases, fund short-term customer credit, or settle supplier bills. Delaying payments to suppliers (without harming relationships) can also ease pressure on cash flow, as can encouraging faster customer payments. Managing stock levels carefully to avoid tying up funds in excess inventory is another way businesses internally finance working capital needs.

However, not all businesses have the luxury of strong retained profits or optimal cash flow. This is where external sources come into play.

Bank overdrafts are a common short-term solution. They offer flexible access to funds, often with interest charged only on the amount used. Overdrafts are useful for bridging short-term cash flow gaps but can become costly if used for extended periods.

Trade credit from suppliers is another widely used form of funding. By offering payment terms of 30 to 90 days, suppliers effectively finance part of a business’s working capital.

Invoice finance, including factoring and invoice discounting, allows businesses to release cash tied up in unpaid invoices. A lender advances a percentage of the invoice value upfront, improving cash flow while awaiting customer payment.

Short-term loans and revolving credit facilities are also available. These may come from banks or alternative lenders and can provide structured funding with fixed repayment schedules.

The right mix of funding depends on the nature of the business, the industry it operates in, and its financial health.

The UK government has officially concluded its involvement with NatWest Group, formerly known as the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), by selling its remaining shares. This move ends nearly 17 years of public ownership that began during the 2008 financial crisis.

In 2008 and 2009, the government injected £45.5 billion into RBS to stabilise the bank, which at the time was one of the largest in the world, with over 40 million customers and operations in more than 50 countries. This intervention was deemed necessary to protect the UK economy and financial system from collapse, safeguarding millions of savers, businesses, and jobs.

Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Emma Reynolds, highlighted that bringing NatWest fully back into private ownership is a significant milestone for the UK banking sector post-financial crisis. She noted that the current government halted a planned retail share sale, which could have cost taxpayers hundreds of millions, opting instead to sell shares at market value to prioritise taxpayer interests.

To date, £35 billion has been returned to the Exchequer through share sales, dividends, and fees. While this is approximately £10.5 billion less than the original support provided, the Office for Budget Responsibility has indicated that the cost of inaction would have been far greater, potentially devastating people's savings, mortgages, and livelihoods, and undermining confidence in the UK's financial system.