As part of the Budget measures, the government confirmed plans to make some changes to the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS).

From 6 April 2026, HMRC will be able to take immediate action where a business makes or receives a payment that it knew, or should have known, was connected to fraud. In these circumstances, HMRC will have the power to remove Gross Payment Status (GPS) with immediate effect, assess the business for the associated tax loss, and impose a penalty of up to 30%. This penalty may be applied to the business itself or to its officers. Where GPS is withdrawn due to fraud or serious non-compliance, the business will also be barred from reapplying for GPS for a period of five years (an increase from the current one-year limit).

Alongside these measures, the government also plans to simplify the CIS by exempting payments to local authorities and certain public bodies. As part of this change the requirement for construction contractors to submit nil returns will be required. These changes are due to take effect from 6 April 2026 and will first be subject to technical consultation.

The CIS is a set of special tax and National Insurance rules for businesses operating in the construction industry. Under the scheme, businesses are classed as either contractors or subcontractors, and both must understand their tax obligations.

Qualifying contractors are required to deduct tax from payments made to subcontractors and pass these deductions to HMRC. The amounts deducted count as advance payments towards the subcontractor’s tax and National Insurance liabilities.

Subcontractors are not required to register for the CIS, but where they are not registered, contractors must deduct tax at a higher rate of 30%. Registered subcontractors are subject to a 20% deduction unless they qualify for GPS. Where GPS applies, no deductions are made by the contractor, and the subcontractor is responsible for paying all tax and National Insurance at the end of the tax year.

To qualify for GPS, a subcontractor must meet specific criteria, including a strong compliance history of paying tax and National Insurance on time, and carrying on a business that undertakes construction work or supplies construction labour in the UK.

A recent ruling has increased the scope of statutory protection for whistleblowers to include covered detriments against co-workers under the Employment Rights Act 1996. A Mr. Rice was dismissed by his company owner on the grounds of redundancy in February 2021. Mr. Rice asserted that his dismissal was automatically unfair, given that it was motivated by his protected disclosures. He subsequently applied to amend his claim to include a detriment claim against his owner-employer, alleging that his dismissal was a detriment in contravention of Section 47B of the Act. The core issue arose when he sought to amend his claim to include an additional complaint, specifically that his dismissal constituted a detriment inflicted by a co-worker, for which the owner was vicariously liable under the 1996 Act.

This principle states that the exclusion (Section 47B) only bars a direct detriment claim against the employer for its own act of dismissal. However, it does not bar a claim against a co-worker (under S. 47B(1A)) for the detriment of dismissal. Consequently, if a co-worker is liable for the act of dismissal as a detriment, the employer automatically becomes vicariously liable for that act under Section 47B(1B). This effectively allows the employee to bring a detriment claim against the employer for the act of dismissal itself. 

The ruling creates a crucial pathway through which employees may obtain a more comprehensive remedy for the act of dismissal, no longer solely restricting whistleblowers to a claim of unfair dismissal. This significantly increases the potential value of any award for damages, particularly in distressing cases.

Employees can now pursue the individual co-worker who carried out the dismissal – in this case, the owner of the firm. This is an important concession, especially where a company becomes insolvent, as the personal liability remains. Employers should be wary of their conduct toward whistleblowers, as they may find themselves personally liable for their words and deeds.

Acquiring new assets is often essential for small businesses looking to grow, improve efficiency or remain competitive. Whether the investment is in vehicles, machinery, IT systems or specialist equipment, choosing the right funding method can have a significant impact on cash flow, tax efficiency and overall financial resilience. Understanding the main options available allows business owners to make more informed decisions.

Using existing cash reserves is the most straightforward option. Paying outright avoids interest costs and keeps administration simple. However, it can leave the business exposed if working capital is reduced too far. For many businesses, preserving cash for day to day operations, tax liabilities and unexpected costs is just as important as the asset purchase itself.

Bank loans remain a common funding route. Term loans allow the cost of an asset to be spread over its useful life, helping to align repayments with the income the asset generates. While interest rates are higher than in previous years, loans can still be suitable where cash flows are predictable, and the business has sufficient headroom to meet repayments. It is important to consider any security requirements and the impact on future borrowing capacity.

Asset finance is widely used for equipment, vehicles and machinery. Hire purchase and finance lease arrangements allow businesses to acquire assets with limited upfront cost, spreading payments over an agreed period. In many cases, the asset itself provides the security, which can reduce the need for personal guarantees. Asset finance can also offer flexibility, particularly where technology changes quickly or assets need regular replacement.

Operating leases are another option, especially for assets that depreciate rapidly or become obsolete. Rather than owning the asset, the business pays for its use over a fixed term. This can reduce balance sheet exposure and help manage cash flow, although ownership does not pass to the business at the end of the agreement.

For owner managed companies, director loans or additional capital introduced by shareholders may be considered. While this can avoid external borrowing, it still requires careful planning around tax, repayment terms and the long term impact on personal finances.

Each funding option has different accounting and tax implications, including capital allowances, interest relief and balance sheet treatment. The right choice will depend on the type of asset, the strength of the business cash flow and the wider financial objectives.

A short discussion at the planning stage can often lead to a more efficient and sustainable outcome.

Cash flow remains one of the most pressing concerns for small businesses, even where trading appears stable. Many businesses are finding that rising costs, cautious lenders and slower customer payments are combining to create ongoing pressure on day to day finances. In our experience, cash flow issues rarely arise from a single event. They tend to build gradually, which is why early visibility and proactive management are so important.

Operating costs have increased across most sectors, and these increases now feel structural rather than temporary. Wages, energy, insurance and supplier costs remain significantly higher than they were only a few years ago. For businesses with limited pricing power or fixed contracts, margins can be squeezed quickly, leaving less room to absorb delays in customer payments or unexpected expenses.

Access to finance has also become more restrictive. Overdrafts and short term lending are more expensive, reviews are more frequent and approval processes can take longer. This makes it harder to rely on borrowing as a flexible buffer when cash inflows are uneven. As a result, businesses need a clearer understanding of their cash position and greater control over the timing of payments in and out.

Late payment continues to be a major contributor to cash flow stress. Even well run businesses can struggle if customers consistently pay late or extend terms without discussion. When receipts are delayed, pressure quickly passes through to VAT, PAYE and Corporation Tax liabilities. What begins as a timing issue can escalate into missed deadlines, penalties or the need for time to pay arrangements with HMRC.

Credit control is another area where small improvements can have a meaningful impact. Prompt invoicing, clear payment terms and consistent follow up should be standard practice. Strong credit control is not about damaging relationships. It is about setting clear expectations and protecting the financial health of the business.

If you are experiencing cash flow pressure, or if you simply want greater confidence in your numbers, we can help. Please contact us to review your cash flow position, explore practical options and put a plan in place before issues become more difficult to manage.

1 January 2026 – Due date for Corporation Tax due for the year ended 31 March 2025

19 January 2026 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 January 2026. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 January 2026).

19 January 2026 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 January 2026.

19 January 2026 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 January 2026 is payable by today.

31 January 2026 – Last day to file 2024-25 self-assessment tax returns online.

31 January 2026 – Balance of self-assessment tax owing for 2024-25 due to be settled on or before today unless you have elected to extend this deadline by formal agreement with HMRC. Also due is any first payment on account for 2025-26.

1 February 2026 – Due date for Corporation Tax payable for the year ended 30 April 2025.

19 February 2026 – PAYE and NIC deductions due for month ended 5 February 2026. (If you pay your tax electronically the due date is 22 February 2026)

19 February 2026 – Filing deadline for the CIS300 monthly return for the month ended 5 February 2026.

19 February 2026 – CIS tax deducted for the month ended 5 February 2026 is payable by today.

From 6 April 2026, new tax rules will expand workplace benefits relief. The changes will simplify the treatment of certain low-value workplace benefits-in-kind (BIKs), affecting both employers and employees.

The changes extend existing exemptions for eye tests, flu vaccinations and home working equipment to include reimbursements, aligning them with current provisions for direct supply.

Under current law, employers can provide these benefits tax-free, but reimbursements were excluded. The upcoming changes will ensure that reimbursed expenses for eye tests, flu vaccines and home office equipment are treated the same as where the employer provides the benefit directly for Income Tax and National Insurance purposes.

These changes aim to streamline the tax system, reduce administrative burdens and better reflect modern working practices. Employees will benefit by being able to claim reimbursements for minor work-related costs without tax or National Insurance implications.

The 2027 reforms will shift more responsibility to personal representatives, who may need to manage withholding arrangements and settle any IHT before pension benefits are released.

From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and death benefits will be included in IHT, meaning that more pension assets could be taxed when someone dies. This is a major change from the current rules, which largely exclude these funds from IHT.

Individuals with significant pension savings should review their estate plans carefully. Under the new rules, beneficiaries could face an IHT charge on inherited pension funds. Responsibility for reporting and paying this tax will fall on personal representatives, not the pension scheme administrators.

There are some important exceptions. Death-in-service benefits from registered pension schemes and dependants’ pensions from defined benefit or collective money purchase schemes will continue to be exempt from IHT.

It was announced as part of the Budget 2025 measures that from 6 April 2027, if a deceased person’s estate is expected to owe IHT, their personal representatives can instruct the pension provider to withhold 50% of taxable pension‑death benefits for up to 15 months. They must then pay any IHT due to the tax authorities before releasing the rest to beneficiaries. This does not apply to exempt benefits, small pots (under £1,000) or ongoing annuities. Personal representatives will also be discharged from liability for pensions discovered after they have received clearance from HMRC. 

Agricultural and business property relief changes that were first announced at Autumn Budget 2024 will come into effect from 6 April 2026. These measures will introduce significant reforms to Business Property Relief (BPR) and Agricultural Property Relief (APR), which provide Inheritance Tax (IHT) relief on qualifying business and agricultural assets. These measures have faced significant criticism for their potential impact on small farms and rural communities.

From April 2026, a new £1 million allowance will apply to the combined value of property in an estate qualifying for 100% BPR or 100% APR. This means that the existing 100% rate of IHT relief will only apply to the combined value of property in an estate qualifying for 100% BPR or 100% APR. The rate of IHT relief will be reduced to 50% for the value of any qualifying assets over £1 million. Accordingly, any assets receiving 50% relief will be effectively taxed at 20% IHT (the full rate being 40%).

The government has also confirmed they will reduce the rate of BPR available from 100% to 50% in all circumstances for shares designated as 'not listed' on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, such as AIM. The existing rate of relief will continue at 50% where it is currently this rate and will also not be affected by the new allowance.

The option to pay IHT by equal annual instalments over 10 years interest-free will be extended to all qualifying property which is eligible for APR or BPR.

The June 2025 reforms introduce a £35,000 income limit for keeping the Winter Fuel Payment, with HMRC recovering the payment from those above the threshold.

The WFP is a tax-free payment provided by the government to help older people keep warm during winter. The amount of the payment depends on individual circumstances but ranges from £100 to £300. The amount you receive depends on a number of factors including your age and the age of other people living with you.

Pensioners whose taxable income exceeds £35,000 will still receive payment but this will be recovered in full by HMRC using the new WFP tax charge. The recovery will be handled through PAYE tax‑code adjustments or the self-assessment return, depending on the taxpayer’s circumstances.

The threshold applies to individuals, not household income. This means that in some couples, one person may keep their payment while the other has theirs reclaimed, depending on individual incomes. Individuals in receipt of certain social security benefits in the qualifying week for winter payments will not be liable to the charge, regardless of income. 

The new rules will allow companies to raise more capital under the following schemes although investors will need to factor in reduced VCT Income Tax relief when assessing opportunities.

The Venture Capital Trusts (VCT) and Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) are designed to encourage private investment into trading companies. Both schemes help support business growth while at the same time encouraging individuals to fund these companies.

A number of changes to the schemes were announced at Budget 2025 and will apply from 6 April 2026.

The main changes are as follows:

• Gross assets limits: Companies’ gross assets will increase for EIS and VCT eligibility to £30 million immediately before the share issue (from £15 million) and £35 million immediately after the issue (from £16 million).
• Annual investment limits: Companies will be able to raise up to £10 million annually (from £5 million) and £20 million for knowledge-intensive companies (from £10 million).
• Lifetime investment limits: Companies’ lifetime limit will increase to £24 million (from £12 million), and £40 million for knowledge-intensive companies (from £20 million).
• VCT Income Tax relief: The rate of Income Tax relief for individuals investing in VCTs will reduce from 30% to 20%.

These increases in annual, lifetime and gross assets apply only to qualifying companies that are not registered in Northern Ireland and are not engaged in trading goods, or in the generation, transmission, distribution, supply, wholesale trade, or cross-border exchange of electricity. These companies remain eligible under the current scheme limits.

These changes are designed to encourage larger investments into qualifying companies. Investors should be aware of the reduced VCT Income Tax relief available and ensure that investments still remain worthwhile.

The government announced at Budget 2025 that dividend income, property and savings income, will be subject to new tax rates. These changes will be legislated for through the Finance Bill 2025–26 and will be phased in between April 2026 and April 2027.

Dividend income

From April 2026, most dividend income will be subject to higher rates of tax. The ordinary and upper dividend tax rates will each increase by two percentage points, rising to 10.75% and 35.75%, respectively. The additional rate will remain unchanged at 39.35%.

Property income

From 6 April 2027, new tax rates will apply to property income with an increase of two percentage points in each tax band. This will mean that property income will be taxed at 22% for basic rate taxpayers, 42% for higher rate taxpayers and 47% for additional rate taxpayers from 2027-28. These rates will apply in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The government has stated that it will work with the devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales to facilitate their ability to set their own property income tax rates.

Savings income

Savings income will also be subject to revised rates from 6 April 2027. In line with the changes to property income, the basic, higher and additional rates applicable to savings income will increase by two percentage points to 22%, 42% and 47%, respectively.

The government has confirmed that the existing allowances for savings income will remain unchanged. Basic rate taxpayers will continue to receive up to £1,000 of tax-free interest, while higher rate taxpayers will retain the £500 allowance. The Starting Rate for Savings, which provides up to £5,000 of savings income tax-free for lower earners, will also remain in place.

Many businesses regard their overheads as fixed, predictable, and largely outside their control. In reality, an overhead audit often uncovers costs that have risen quietly, services that are no longer used, and processes that have gone unchallenged for far too long. Carrying out a structured review of overheads can make a surprising difference to cash flow, operational efficiency, and long-term resilience.

The first step is gathering recurring costs in one place. Software subscriptions, insurance, utility bills, telecoms, outsourced services, and routine maintenance contracts tend to increase gradually, which means individual changes can slip by unnoticed. When everything is viewed together, patterns become easier to spot. It is common to find duplicated tools, unused licences, or outdated service packages still being paid for out of habit rather than need.

Contract renewals deserve close attention. Many suppliers rely on the fact that clients rarely challenge terms once a service becomes familiar. Automatic renewals can lock a business into pricing or packages that no longer represent value. Reviewing renewal dates and comparing alternatives ahead of time allows the business to renegotiate, downscale, or switch suppliers before costs escalate.

An overhead audit also helps ensure that spending aligns with current operations. If the business has expanded, streamlined, shifted to remote work, or adopted new technology, its overhead structure may no longer make sense. Processes that once required manual effort might now be automated. Support services that were essential during one phase of growth may be unnecessary now. Questioning each cost in the context of how the business operates today often reveals opportunities to both reduce spend and improve workflow.

Energy usage is another area where even small steps can create meaningful savings. Reviewing tariffs, checking meter accuracy, and adopting simple efficiency measures can help stabilise costs in a market where prices move unpredictably. An audit encourages the business to think proactively, rather than reacting only when bills rise sharply.

Beyond savings, the audit strengthens planning. Once overheads are clearly understood, financial forecasting becomes more accurate and decisions around pricing, investment, and staffing become more grounded. The business gains a clearer view of its baseline costs and can respond more confidently to changes in trading conditions.

A regular overhead audit is not about cutting costs for the sake of it. It is about ensuring the business is not held back by waste, habits, or outdated commitments. By reviewing overheads with purpose and structure, a business can improve efficiency, protect cash flow, and build a more stable foundation for growth.